Free Sample chapter of Make Your Group GrowIf you would like to sample a chapter of my new book, Make Your Group Grow, click here: http://makeyourgroupgrow.group.com/
|
The Starfish and the SpiderIf you lop off the head of a spider, it dies. It is a very centralized organization. If you cut off the leg of a starfish, it will grow a new leg, and the leg will grow a new starfish. It is a very decentralized organization. Question: what kind of organization is the church? What kind of organization should it be? Starfish style organizations are multiplying . . . AA is a starfish organization. No president. No leader. Or, more precisely, everyone is a leader. No one owns AA. No one has any idea how many members they have. Suffice it to say, a lot! Wikipedia Arguably the largest depository of information on the planet and it is all user created. You can edit the content yourself. Users decide what is included and what is not. Very decentralized. Napster--the old Napster before the feds got a hold of it--very decentralized. And, in various incarnations, the idea continues to thrive because of its decentralization. OpenOffice. A Microsoft office look-alike. All user created. All free. Very decentralized. The House Church Movement in America is another example of a starfish movement. From all accounts, it is growing and growing rapidly. Consider these facts for the North American Mission Board's Center for Missional Research http://www.namb.net/cmr (This is gathering information from several sources. There is some discrepancy between the findings.)
There is an explosive house church movement in our land. It is a decentralized, leaderless, starfish movement. How should we respond? As I see it, we could take one of three approaches. Ignore itThis was my approach at first. It seems too big a movement to ignore. Bring a bucket of waterAs I have had the opportunity to talk to church leaders about the house church movement, this is the most common response. The conversation usually includes this sentence: "Well, those house churches are all well and good, but I just think there should be some accountability." I am thinking, "Accountability to whom?" and I think I know the answer. I think he is sitting across the table from me. But, if this house church is a real church, I thought we believed in the autonomy of the local church. I thought we believed local churches were not accountable to anyone except each other and God. The Catholic Church is very spider-like. It is very centralized. Very command and control. The protestant movement was much more decentralized. Baptists in particular are extremely decentralized. I have always thought the name Independent Baptist was a bit redundant. What other kind of Baptist is there? The House Church movement begs the question: how far do you press that? Bring a bucket of gasolineWell, you don't have to be a rocket scientist to figure out I think this is the best approach. What would you call a ten fold increase in house churches in ten years approaching 25% of the population. They have done that with no budget, no money, no visible leaders, no literature, no program, no nothing. I would call it a movement of God. If it is a movement of God, I think we do well to fan it into flames lest we find ourselves opposing what God is doing. Local churches can do at least three things to partner with and encourage house churches:
To respond to this, go to www.sundayschool.ning.com To read more on this, pick up a copy of The Starfish and the Spider: The Unstoppable Power of Leaderless Organizations by Ori Brafman and Rod Beckstrom |
|
|
To unsubscribe, go to www.joshhunt.com/signup.htm |